ScienceIQ.com: Cool science facts delivered daily to your email


 Facts By Category:


 » Physics
 » Astronomy
 » Chemistry
 » Biology
 » Mathematics
 » Geology
 » Engineering
 » Medicine
 » Science

  by keyword search:

    
 ScienceIQ Team:


 »Writers & Editors



xUmp.com
Science Supplies,
Toys & Gifts

PhysLink.com
Physics & Astronomy
Online
The Strange Case Of Phineas Gage


Long before the advent of neuroscience, brain injuries have been used to deduce how the brain is organized into separate regions handling separate tasks. Consider the case of Phineas Gage, a 19th-century railroad construction foreman whose life was dramatically changed when a dynamite charge went off accidentally and blasted a 3 1/2-foot long, 1 1/4-inch in diameter, 13 1/2-pound iron tamping rod into his left cheek, through his upper jaw, through his brain behind his left eye, and out the top of his skull. That kind of injury would surely kill a person, right? Not necessarily. Gage was stunned, but not even knocked unconscious, and before long felt well enough to return to work. The problem was, as his friends and acquaintances said, he was no longer Gage.

The tamping rod had destroyed part of the frontal lobe of his brain (the left ventromedial part, according to reconstructions performed by University of Iowa neuroscientists Hanna and Antonio Damasio), with the bizarre result that his personality was, in effect, that of a completely different person. Instead of the responsible, conscientious man he had formerly been, he had somehow turned into a foul-mouthed, impulsive, irresponsible boor. Even though his intelligence and abilities were exactly the same as before the accident, he was unable to continue his work as foreman.

The strange case of Phineas Gage offers insight into the role that the brain's frontal lobes play in what are sometimes known as 'executive' functions: monitoring one's own behavior, controlling impulses, and generally acting like a mature, rational, socially responsible person. The disturbing thing about Gage's case is that it challenges some of our most basic assumptions about identity and morality, including some of the very assumptions on which our legal system is based. Gage was fully conscious of the consequences of his actions, but nevertheless acted antisocially. Are some sociopaths simply people with abnormalities of their frontal lobes, who are no more to blame for their actions than Gage was for his?

132

About the Author


David GamonDavid Gamon, PhD
Dr. David Gamon, one of the original writers at ScienceIQ, studied cognitive science at U.C. Berkeley, where he received his Ph.D. in Linguistics in 1997. He is the author of many popular books about the human brain, including Building Mental Muscle, Use It Or Lose It!, and Brains That Work a Little Bit Differently. His current projects include books about gender differences in the brain, the brain’s construction of sensory reality, and psychopathy.

Further Reading
Phineas Gage: A Gruesome but True Story About Brain Science
by John Fleischman (Author)


Related Web Links
The Phineas Gage Information Page
by Ian and Malcolm Macmillan

Traumatic Brain Injury Resource Guide
by Centre for Neuro Skills





Home | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2002-2017 ScienceIQ.com - All Rights Reserved